Cognitive Logic QEN METHODOLOGICAL NOTE · v1.0 · April 2026
Position Paper · Public Use · DOI cognitivelogic.it/qen/methodology

QEN Framework
Methodological Note

Quantum Ethics Network Scoring System — Methodological Foundation of Weighting Coefficients

Version v1.0 Date April 2026 Author Roberto Malini — Cognitive Logic Classification Public Use
DOI / Citation cognitivelogic.it/qen/methodology

This document presents the methodological foundation of the weighting coefficients used in the QEN Score — the ethical scoring framework developed by Cognitive Logic for multidimensional assessment of enterprises, products and projects according to Social, Environmental and Territorial sustainability criteria.

The QEN Score is designed to operate natively in AI-first environments. Unlike traditional ESG ratings conceived for annual reports and human analysts, each assessment is a node in a knowledge graph queryable by autonomous agents.

QEN = (Vs × 0.40) + (Va × 0.35) + (Vt × 0.25)
Vs
Social Value
scale 0–100
Va
Environmental Value
scale 0–100
Vt
Territorial Value
scale 0–100

The QEN Framework

The QEN Score is a multidimensional ethical assessment tool designed to operate natively in AI-first environments. The framework comprises three fundamental dimensions, each weighted with a coefficient reflecting the impact hierarchy identified in the context of Italian local commerce and AI governance in the European regulatory environment.

The formula is intentionally transparent and revisable. QEN is not a black-box system. All weights are documented and open to methodological challenge.

Foundation of the Three Dimensions

```
0.40

Social Dimension — Vs

The highest coefficient (40%) is assigned based on the people primacy principle that informs the entire framework architecture. Human protection is the primary obligation of any ethical system operating under EU regulation.

  • EU AI Act (2024/1689/EU) art. 1 and recitals 1–5: AI systems must operate to protect fundamental rights
  • GDPR (2016/679/EU) arts. 22, 35: right not to be subject to automated decisions with significant effects
  • MSCI ESG Research (2020) · UN PRI (2021): social metrics are the strongest predictors of long-term ESG performance
0.35

Environmental Dimension — Va

The environmental coefficient (35%) is second in weight, consistent with the European regulatory hierarchy that subordinates environmental objectives to human protection, but elevates them above territorial rootedness alone.

  • EU Taxonomy (Reg. 2020/852): classification of sustainable economic activities places environmental metrics as the second pillar
  • GRI 300 Standards: de facto international standard for environmental reporting
  • European Green Deal: defines environmental transition as the EU's central strategic axis
0.25

Territorial Dimension — Vt

The territorial coefficient (25%) is the lowest of the three not because local rootedness is less important in absolute terms, but because the territorial dimension is already partially captured by the Social and Environmental dimensions — avoiding double-counting.

  • Third Sector Code (IT): regulatory recognition of proximity and community embeddedness
  • OECD Proximity (2022): "Enhancing Rural Innovation through Proximity Commerce"
  • Framework scalability: QEN is designed to apply also to non-local contexts (AI governance, supply chains)
```

Coefficient Overview

Dimension Coeff. Regulatory Basis Justification
Social 0.40 EU AI Act art.1 · GDPR art.22/35 · MSCI Social 2020 People protection primacy
Environmental 0.35 EU Taxonomy 2020/852 · GRI 300 · European Green Deal Second ESG pillar
Territorial 0.25 Third Sector Code · OECD Proximity 2022 Local specificity, no double-count
Total 1.00 Scale 0–100 per dimension · Resulting QEN Score: 0–100

Open Revision Process

The QEN Framework adopts a semantic versioning model (MAJOR.MINOR). The coefficients in this document constitute version v1.0 and are declared open to peer revision on the basis of documented empirical evidence. Cognitive Logic welcomes methodological contributions from academic institutions, research bodies and European standardisation organisations.

REVISION PROCESS

  1. Public proposal at cognitivelogic.it/qen/methodology
  2. 30-day open comment period
  3. Integration into the next MINOR version with documented changelog

Bibliography

[1]EU AI Act — Regolamento (UE) 2024/1689 del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio
[2]GDPR — Regolamento (UE) 2016/679, artt. 22, 35
[3]EU Taxonomy — Regolamento (UE) 2020/852 sulla tassonomia della finanza sostenibile
[4]GRI Standards 300 — Environmental Topics (2016, updated 2022)
[5]MSCI ESG Research — "Social Factors in ESG Ratings" (2020)
[6]UN PRI — "ESG Integration in Listed Equity" (2021)
[7]OECD — "Enhancing Rural Innovation through Proximity Commerce" (2022)
[8]Cognitive Logic — QEN Knowledge Graph v2.0, 130 nodes · 209 edges (2026)